The Accountability Illusion
- Randall Sellar
- 3 hours ago
- 2 min read
Most organizations say they want accountability.
Leaders ask for it, teams talk about it, and performance reviews reinforce it.
And yet, in many organizations, accountability feels… elusive.
Not because people don’t care, or aren’t capable, but because of something much quieter, the design of accountability.
The Illusion
In theory, accountability is simple.
Someone owns the outcome and makes decisions they will be responsible for.
In practice, it rarely works that way.
Instead, work is often structured so that:
Multiple teams own a piece of the outcome.
Different leaders influence parts of the work.
Decisions require alignment across groups.
When people look at it, it appears collaborative, but in reality, the system creates something entirely different. Shared ownership.
Which often means… no one owns it.
When Everyone Owns a Piece
A familiar pattern shows up. A project spans multiple teams, with each group contributing something important, but no single person owns the full outcome, so progress depends on alignment.
Meetings will be scheduled, stakeholders will be consulted, and updates will be shared.
And slowly, momentum fades. Everyone is moving, but nothing progresses.
Not because people aren’t working hard, but because no one has the authority to move the whole thing forward.
What Actually Happens
When ownership is fragmented, three things tend to follow.
Work Slows Down: Decisions wait for alignment, and alignment takes time.
Decisions Escalate: When no one clearly owns the outcome, decisions move up the chain, pulling senior leaders into issues they shouldn’t need to solve.
Accountability Moves to the End: Ownership shows up after the fact. When something inevitably goes wrong, people ask, “Who was responsible?” The answer is usually… everyone and no one.
That’s not accountability.
That’s hindsight.
The Design Problem
Most accountability issues aren’t behavioural, they’re structural.
Organizations often design work around:
Collaboration
shared goals
cross-functional ownership
All of which are important.
But without clear ownership, they introduce ambiguity, and ambiguity is the enemy of accountability.
What Real Accountability Requires
Real accountability is less about intent and more about design.
Three things need to be true.
One Person Owns the Outcome: Not a group, or a committee, but a person.
Authority Matches Responsibility: If someone is accountable, they must be able to decide. Without authority, accountability becomes frustration.
Outcomes Are Visible: Everyone understands what success looks like. Clarity removes interpretation.
A Different Way to Think About It
Accountability doesn’t come from asking people to step up. It comes from making it clear:
Who will make the decision.
Who owns the outcome.
Who will move things forward when trade-offs are required?
Without that clarity, organizations compensate by holding more meetings, making more attempts at alignment, and having more discussions.
But none of those create accountability; they are just attempts at managing around its absence.
Culture by Design
Organizations don’t become accountable because they value accountability. They become accountable because they design for it, with clear ownership, which creates momentum.
Aligned authority enables decisions.
Defined outcomes drive performance.
Everything else is a workaround.
If everything requires alignment, then nothing really moves.
Comments